The best Side of natural law cases
The best Side of natural law cases
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, marketing a more informed and just society.
The former means “guilty act” plus the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission on the intention, the commission from the act alone is not really plenty of to gain a conviction for that crime. This can be a fundamental principle that all law students are very well acquainted with.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral get more info turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to complete away with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more
Reasonable grounds are available on the record to attach the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. While punishment of your alleged offence does not slide within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case in the petitioner falls in the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion on the same is hereby reproduced:
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is usually a mandatory requirement as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
Extra username and password are essential for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
This case continues to be cited in a lot of subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, along with the rule of law.
Case law, also known as precedent, forms the foundation of the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by accomplishing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death in the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be observed in the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody in the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.